Shell consultant quits, accusing agency of ‘excessive harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety advisor has quit working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “excessive harms” to the surroundings.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change dangers” and urged others within the oil and fuel trade to “stroll away whereas there’s still time”.

The chief, who works for the unbiased company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 employees. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had quit due to Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and gasoline firm of “working past the design limits of our planetary programs” and “not putting environmental safety before manufacturing”.

She mentioned: “Shell’s acknowledged security ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Aim Zero’, they call it – and it sounds honourable but they are utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gasoline extraction causes extreme harms, to our climate, to the environment and to folks. And no matter they say, Shell is simply not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett informed the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I could not carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the results.”

Shell was a “major shopper” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and fuel production. She started working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can now not work for an organization that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she said. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around web zero, they don't seem to be winding down on oil and gas, however planning to discover and extract much more.”

Dennett – a prison justice graduate who has spent her profession in analysis and consultancy – was impressed to stop working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Revolt climate protesters urging the company’s staff to leave. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing challenge encourages oil and gas employees to stroll away from the industry.

The consultant, who runs inside security surveys and is predicated in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to walk away and “many people working in fossil fuel companies just aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves if they really imagine their vision for extra oil and gas extraction secures a secure future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clean vitality sector left amid stories they had been annoyed at the tempo of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to reduce emissions shall be mentioned on the meeting the place the Dutch activist group Comply with It will push for the company’s insurance policies to be more in keeping with the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has informed buyers to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set more stringent local weather goals.

The Shell investor Royal London has mentioned it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief executive, Ben van Beurden, may expertise an investor rebellion towards his £13.5m pay packet at the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote against it.

Sign up to the every day Business Right now electronic mail or comply with Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in no doubt, we're decided to ship on our world strategy to be a net zero company by 2050 and hundreds of our people are working laborious to achieve this. We've set targets for the quick, medium and long term, and have each intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon vitality, although the world will still want oil and gasoline for many years to come back in sectors that may’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to family bills after the power business reported bumper income fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition parties to name on the federal government to bring in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the largest oil and fuel producer in the North Sea spoke out in opposition to a one-off levy, arguing it will result in the trade approving fewer projects.

Harbour Energy’s chief govt, Linda Prepare dinner, advised the Monetary Times: “The next tax burden will make it more difficult for brand spanking new oil and fuel projects to satisfy funding hurdle rates, that means fewer initiatives might be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when industry is being inspired to increase home UK oil and gasoline manufacturing and help an orderly power transition.”

Harbour has told the federal government it plans to take a position $6bn within the North Sea over three years as industry makes its case in opposition to the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook had obtained a £4.6m “golden hi there” from the agency.