Shell marketing consultant quits, accusing agency of ‘extreme harms’ to environment | Shell

A senior safety consultant has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gas producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “excessive harms” to the setting.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change dangers” and urged others in the oil and gasoline industry to “stroll away whereas there’s still time”.

The manager, who works for the independent company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 workers. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had give up due to Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas firm of “operating past the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not placing environmental security before production”.

She stated: “Shell’s acknowledged safety ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Goal Zero’, they call it – and it sounds honourable however they are fully failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gas extraction causes extreme harms, to our climate, to our environment and to folks. And whatever they say, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett told the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, including: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the results.”

Shell was a “major consumer” of Dennett’s business, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries together with oil and fuel manufacturing. She began working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the industry.

“I can now not work for an organization that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions round internet zero, they are not winding down on oil and fuel, but planning to discover and extract rather more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her career in analysis and consultancy – was inspired to stop working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Revolt local weather protesters urging the company’s employees to go away. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing venture encourages oil and gasoline employees to stroll away from the business.

The marketing consultant, who runs inside safety surveys and is predicated in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to be able to stroll away and “many people working in fossil gasoline companies simply aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really consider their vision for more oil and gas extraction secures a safe future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clean energy sector left amid reviews they were pissed off at the pace of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to cut back emissions might be discussed at the meeting the place the Dutch activist group Observe This will push for the company’s insurance policies to be more in keeping with the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has informed investors to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set more stringent local weather targets.

The Shell investor Royal London has stated it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, might expertise an investor rise up against his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote in opposition to it.

Signal up to the daily Business At this time email or observe Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson stated: “Be in little question, we're decided to ship on our world technique to be a internet zero firm by 2050 and thousands of our individuals are working hard to achieve this. We've set targets for the short, medium and long term, and have each intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon energy, though the world will nonetheless need oil and fuel for decades to return in sectors that may’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a possible windfall tax to fund cuts to family bills after the power trade reported bumper profits fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition events to call on the federal government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the largest oil and gasoline producer within the North Sea spoke out towards a one-off levy, arguing it would lead to the industry approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Vitality’s chief govt, Linda Cook dinner, instructed the Financial Occasions: “A higher tax burden will make it more difficult for brand new oil and gas tasks to satisfy investment hurdle charges, meaning fewer tasks will probably be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when trade is being encouraged to extend domestic UK oil and gas production and assist an orderly vitality transition.”

Harbour has informed the federal government it plans to speculate $6bn within the North Sea over three years as trade makes its case against the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had obtained a £4.6m “golden hey” from the agency.