Shell consultant quits, accusing firm of ‘excessive harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety advisor has stop working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gas producer in a bombshell public video of causing “extreme harms” to the environment.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change risks” and urged others within the oil and gas trade to “stroll away while there’s nonetheless time”.

The executive, who works for the independent company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 employees. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had stop because of Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas agency of “working past the design limits of our planetary techniques” and “not putting environmental security earlier than manufacturing”.

She said: “Shell’s stated safety ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Aim Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they are utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gasoline extraction causes excessive harms, to our climate, to the environment and to people. And whatever they are saying, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett instructed the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I could not carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the consequences.”

Shell was a “main client” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries together with oil and gasoline manufacturing. She began working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the industry.

“I can no longer work for a corporation that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the risks of local weather change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions round internet zero, they aren't winding down on oil and fuel, but planning to explore and extract rather more.”

Dennett – a legal justice graduate who has spent her career in research and consultancy – was inspired to cease working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Rise up local weather protesters urging the company’s staff to depart. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing mission encourages oil and gasoline staff to stroll away from the business.

The marketing consultant, who runs inner safety surveys and is predicated in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to walk away and “many individuals working in fossil fuel corporations simply aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves if they really believe their imaginative and prescient for extra oil and fuel extraction secures a protected future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clean power sector left amid reviews they were annoyed on the tempo of Shell’s shift in direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to scale back emissions will be mentioned on the assembly the place the Dutch activist group Observe It will push for the corporate’s insurance policies to be more in line with the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has told traders to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set more stringent local weather targets.

The Shell investor Royal London has stated it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, could expertise an investor riot against his £13.5m pay packet at the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Sign up to the daily Business At the moment e-mail or observe Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in no doubt, we're decided to deliver on our world technique to be a internet zero firm by 2050 and 1000's of our individuals are working onerous to achieve this. We have now set targets for the quick, medium and long term, and have each intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon power, although the world will still need oil and fuel for many years to return in sectors that may’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to family bills after the energy business reported bumper profits fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition parties to call on the government to bring in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the largest oil and gas producer in the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it could lead to the trade approving fewer initiatives.

Harbour Energy’s chief government, Linda Cook dinner, informed the Financial Times: “A higher tax burden will make it more difficult for brand spanking new oil and fuel initiatives to meet investment hurdle charges, that means fewer tasks will be sanctioned.

“That is at a time when business is being encouraged to extend domestic UK oil and fuel manufacturing and support an orderly vitality transition.”

Harbour has instructed the federal government it plans to take a position $6bn in the North Sea over three years as industry makes its case in opposition to the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had received a £4.6m “golden hiya” from the agency.